A Scanner Darkly

Jerry Fabin is covered in aphids. Or at least he thinks so, spending most of his time in the shower. His friend Charles Freck tries to help, but eventually must take Jerry to New-Path, a center to help addicts of Substance D (known as Death) come off the drug and adjust to life without intoxicants. Charles catches up with Donna Hawthorne, Bob Arctor's supposed girlfriend/dealer, scores some Substance D and falls in with Bob's crowd. Bob Arctor lives with two roommates, Barris and Luckman. What Bob's roommates don't know is that there is more to Bob than his trivial job and his addiction. Bob is a narc called Fred, working for the Narcotics Division undercover. Whenever Fred enters the station to report, he wears a "scramble suit", so that he can't be identified. All narcotics officers wear them. When Fred is assigned to stake out his own identity in the drug world, Bob Arctor, things begin to fall apart for him. At first, Fred finds it ironic that he is staking out himself, but as the drug corrodes his brain, literally splitting the hemispheres apart, Bob/Fred separate and reality twists into shivering fibers of uncertainty. Barris and Luckman start to behave strangely, as Fred observes them on the holo-tapes. Bob begins to speak and think in German. What will happen to Bob/Fred if he doesn't stop using Substance D? Why is Donna so standoffish if she likes Bob as much as she claims to? How deep can Bob/Fred go before something snaps inside his head? Or has it snapped already? 'A Scanner Darkly' is classic the author Philip K. Dick. He vividly paints the funnier antics of substance abuse, and the tragedies that follow. The conversations between the men when they are high are both pathetic and hilarious. It's pretty obvious the author had some experience walking the pretty path of flowering hallucinations. This book is poetic and realistic even in today's society though it was written in 1977. There is no "old" feeling to the storyline. And, there is a big surprise waiting for you in the end. Also, read the Author's Note at the end, where the author Philip K. Dick describes himself and his friends, and their forays into the drug society, as children playing in the street. When one gets hit by a car (overdose, brain damage, etc) the rest of them would continue to play, oblivious to the dangers. He then lists his friends who he lost to this vicious game. 'A Scanner Darkly' is a definite buy, if you like to collect drug books like Luke Davies's 'Candy', Burroughs's 'Junky', Thompson's 'Fear And Loathing In Las Vegas', and Selby's 'Requiem For A Dream'. Grab a hold of your worst vice, whether wine or chocolate or Substance D, sit back, relax, and Enjoy!

Very fascinating read. Believable sci-fi trappings. Lots of elements that’ll make you sweat, as they’ve only become more relevant today. Also, a very intimate, unvarnished look at drug culture. Two negatives of note, I would say. One being the prose. A bit clunky and inelegant at times. Maybe it’s more of a stylistic thing from PKD? This is the first of his works that I’ve read, so I’m not sure. It took getting used to, but in the end, I was able to enjoy the story for what it was. Also. Not a happy ending. Pretty miserable, in fact. This isn’t a book to read if you want to come away with butterflies and rainbows fluttering about your day afterwards. I’m still very glad I took the time to read this one!

This full length novel was written in 1977 and is pretty much a straight autobiography by Philip K Dick of his life after he divorced his wife. He wasn't an undercover cop - but he did live in a run down old house with a few friends, and they all did drugs constantly. One friend was obsessed by bugs. Another one was completely paranoid. They worried about narcs infiltrating their group. This story is written almost stream-of-consciousness so you have to kick back, relax and go with the story. The story is set "in the future" from 1977, which still happens to now be in our past - 1994. Fred, a cop, is undercover in a druggie-filled house under the name of "Bob Arctor". He is trying to figure out who is dealing a powerful drug, Substance D. When he's in the police station, to hide his identity, he wears a "scramble suit" - a full body outfit that hides who he is. Nobody at the cop station - including his boss - knows what he really looks like. They only know he's assigned to a certain druggie-filled house. So shortly into the story he's told by his boss to focus on a certain person in the house - Bob. I.e. himself. The house is set up with cameras and audio recording houses, so soon Fred (the cop) is watching videos of Bob (the druggie, the same person) hanging out with his friends and having really long, nonsensical conversations. But are they really nonsensical? They worry about narcs (which is valid). They worry about being watched (which is valid). In twisted ways, many of the things they ramble about are true, that many "normal" people wouldn't have picked up on. Being a Philip K Dick story, there's a twist, and the story ends on a realistic note, not a Hollywood one. But as always Dick gives you the sense that things really can get better, if the average person just reaches out and tries. I can see why some people have problems with this book. It's not a straightforward plot of X happens Y happens Z is the reason. Instead, it's a complex interplay of personalities. Each person in the story has a rich world both in reality and in their fantasy mind. Part of what Substance D does is split the brain into parts so that a person can literally believe two things at once ("the gas tank is full" and "the gas tank is empty"). So sometimes when Fred is at the police station he knows that his undercover personae is Bob - and sometimes he completely forgets and thinks Bob is one of his druggy friends that he distrusts. Barris, one of the druggie house-mates, seems both a brilliant scientist and a completely inept crazy. He sits and watches as another druggie chokes to death, timing his call to the police so that he gets all the glory of reporting the tragic death. Donna, the only female in the story, sometimes has brilliant ideas and at other times seems completely lost. One of the druggies is obsessed with bugs - so another druggie dutifully helps him collect up the imaginary insects to bring in for scientific review. Both are shocked when the jars later are empty. This isn't just a story about "drugs eat your brain, drugs suck". The book talks a great deal about how most of the people were hooked involuntarily and are now stuck with the addiction. It shows how those who supposedly help people break their addiction are heartless and cruel. The other members of society discard the druggies as being worthless, abandoning an entire group of their population to certain death. The druggies expect to steal from each other, lie to each other, and eventually die - sooner rather than later. It's not just a problem with the drugs. It's a problem with the entire society and how it treats those who have been hooked. So a lot of the story is told in the small interactions with people. How Bob feels about Donna, his girlfriend who does't like to be touched. How Barris likes his friends while activly plotting their destruction. How the feelings which are real interleave with those which are imaginary. As hard as any character tries to pin down "what is really happening', reality shimmers. In one scene Bob sleeps with a random girl he met - and thinks for a moment he slept with Donna. Even later, in the police station, watching the recording of the scene, he sees that same vision. Is his basic sense of reality so skewed that it cannot be distinguised from the things he sees? Do any of us know what we really see - or what we think we've seen? I really did love many of the scenes in the book, including the classic 10-speed-bike scene. How each character reacts to the situation is priceless. They each have their own agenda and motivations. This isn't a murder mystery where the end of the book wraps up everything neatly and explains why each person did what they did. In fact, the book ends with a list of Philip K Dick's actual friends and family who were harmed or killed by drugs. He includes himself and his ex-wife on the list. The book is an insight into what drugs really do to groups of people - and what our society suffers as a result. It's a wake-up call for people to start caring - and to start listening.

This is an okay read. Worth some time but don't go out of your way to get it.

A gripping and moving novel about the consequences of drug (ab)use written with a humane touch and empathy. Philip Dick is here capable of conveying the deepest contradictions of drug abuse in a seemingly permissive society which is, actually, without mercy for the individual who loses control over themselves. I would say that this novel should be read in parallel with The Naked Lunch by William Burroughs; Dick's novel offers another view on the same, terrible world regulated by the "Algebra of need" but with less cynism and irony than Burroughs. Absolutely brilliant the examinations with the psychiatrists and the idea of the scramble suits.

I'm not a big scifi fan but this book kept my attention. I saw the movie years ago and decided to read the book because the book is always better than the movie. And well, this novel wasn't any different. I've always been intrigued with how drugs bend and twist ones perception of reality. And this book shows how that reality can become permanently distorted. Loved it<3

I re-read this book as I am doing with all 35 or so Phillip K Dick books I have. It is a very powerful book for anyone who lived through the 60's and was even minimally aware of drug cultures. Dick obviously was immensley affected by this period in his life. Unlike many of his others, this is not a fun book. But it is well written and very engaging - I could not put it down.

Edition is corresponding to the description.

After reading The Man in the High Castle I was in need of another instalment from Philip K Dick. This book is just as good and I would certainly recommend it to anyone who is a fan of his work. PKD masterfully illustrates the little, isolated world of the characters united in their use of the malign drug known as Substance D, mirroring their struggle with that of a nation's. There is intrigue and duality for our protagonist and supporting characters who keep you guessing. This is not, perhaps,a story for the faint of heart however as there are some disturbing scenes related to the mental and physical consequences of substance abuse from the start. For people with an open mind, or fan's of his other material, this is an experience worth having.